英语作文 > ：ipads,vs,textbook是由小学生作文网为您精心收集，如果觉得好，请把这篇文章复制到您的博客或告诉您的朋友，以下是ipads,vs,textbook的正文：

第一篇:《Kindle vs. iPad for reading books》

My wife gave me a Kindle 2 last Christmas. I'd reviewed and mostly liked Amazon.com's best-selling

e-reader, but I wasn't sure it would ever replace “real” books for me.

Like a lot of readers, I love the physical nature of books — the feel, the design, even the smell. But the more I used the Kindle, the more I liked it.

And then ... along came the iPad. I don't have Kindle owner's remorse, but I understand the angst of those who do. With its grayscale display and does-one-thing-well approach

Amazon's e-reader is neither as stylishly alluring nor as powerful as Apple's product.

But how do the two compare strictly as e-book readers? When you

残狼灰满读后感

simply want to sit down and enjoy a good book, which has the best experience?

Here's a look at how the iPad and the Kindle compare as e-readers in

four key areas: readability, ergonomics, convenience and cost.

• • READABILITY. Can you look at it for a long time without eyestrain? Are the characters on the screen crisp and easy to see?

The Kindle uses a reflective

screen with no backlighting — just like a paper book — while the iPad has an LED backlit display. Each has

advantages and disadvantages. The Kindle requires decent external lighting; you can't read well in a dark room. The iPad has a bright screen, but it doesn't do well in direct sunlight.

Usually I have no problems reading a backlit screen, but it bothers a lot of people. However, reading for long periods on my iPad is difficult. I don't have a problem spending hours with the Kindle. As first noted by John

Gruber on his Daring Fireball blog, the reason may have to do with how close together the pixels are, a factor known as pixel density. The iPad's pixel

density is less than that of the Kindle — or the iPhone小学作文大全 — so the characters are less distinct. The advantage here goes to the Kindle.

• • ERGONOMICS. Is it easy写老师的作文 to handle and use? Are buttons and other

controls comfortable to access? Does using it create physical strain?ipads,vs,textbook。

At 1.5 pounds, the iPad is relatively heavy, compared with the Kindle and iPhone. While it's light compared to,

say, the hardback version of Stephen King's The Dome, you still feel its heft after holding it for a while. The Kindle, meanwhile, is about the weight of a thick comic book. You can hold it comfortably for hours. The Kindle's also smaller, so it's also easier to juggle while reading in bed (though that's not the case with its larger incarnation, the Kindle DX).

The iPad has an advantage when it comes to page turning — it's simpler and natural. You can either just tap the edges of the virtual pages on the

screen in the iBooks app, or move your finger along the bottom as though you are turning a page. It works this way in the Kindle app, as well. The Kindle 2 requires that you press long buttons on either side of its case to turn pages.

• • CONVENIENCE. Can you buy books directly from the device? Are you able to read purchases on other devices?

Both the Kindle and the iPad have dedicated e-book stores accessible from within the respective devices. You can buy books separately, too — from Amazon's Web site for the Kindle, and from iTunes for the iPad. Unfortunately, you can't buy books directly from within the Kindle app on the iPad — you must use the iPad's Safari Web browser, where you can complete your purchase.

Nevertheless, the Kindle wins here, because you can read Kindle books on many different platforms — Macs, PCs, smart phones (including the iPhone) and, of course, the iPad. The Kindle uses a feature called WhisperSync to

第二篇:《Textbooks》

Textbooks’ Digital Future

E-books may be replacing hardbound versions in college

classrooms.

Greg Hinsdale / Corbis

Harold Elder is not your typical Apple fanboy. Yet the 58-year-old University of Alabama economics professor pre-ordered an iPad to make sure he had one of the first ones. The device is “something that I’ve been waiting for for years,” he says. And not, to be clear, merely for reasons of gadget lust. “It really has the possibility of making the learning experience much richer,” says Elder, who is considering testing a new iPad-ready digital textbook in his introductory microeconomics course in the fall of 2010.

Gallery: Best Majors for Big Paychecks »

“Richer” is certainly the right word to use. App developers aren’t the only ones who greeted the iPad’s release with gratitude and optimism. The textbook industry, too, sees it as a way to woo customers away from the used-book market, boost profits, and help students learn better. It’s a pivotal moment for a segment of the publishing industry that has stubbornly resisted change. Thanks in large part to the iPad and an expected rush of competitor slates, that resistance is crumbling. Of course, it won’t happen overnight. Textbooks today are still bought and sold in much the same way they’ve always been: as ink-and-paper objects assigned by professors and purchased by students in campus bookstores. “It’s a slow-moving pharmaceutical market,” says Matt MacInnis, the CEO of Inkling, a startup working on digital textbooks. “The professor writes a prescription, and the student goes to fill it.” It may be slow-moving, but it’s highly profitable. While McGraw-Hill Education’s earnings fell by 14 percent in 2009 because of the recession, college textbook sales actually increased.

But just ask any journalist or musician: technology has a way of laying siege to comfortable industries. And the iPad may be the first of many barbarians at the gate. Apple sold 3 million of the devices in its first three

months, and now competitors, reportedly including Google,

Hewlett-Packard, and Amazon, are preparing rivals. Educators and

students are enthusiastic about them; at least three colleges, including the Illinois Institute of Technology, will offer free iPads to incoming students. But what will they put on them besides Bejeweled and Facebook?

There are already digital textbooks available, and their numbers are expected to grow: according to Simba Information, which provides data and research on the media industry, they represent less than 2 percent of textbook sales today, but will reach 10 percent by 2012. But in 2010 the offerings were pretty meager. CourseSmart, a San Mateo, Calif.,ipads,vs,textbook。

company collectively owned by five of the biggest textbook publishers, has 6,000 educational titles for sale in digital format. But its electronic books are little more than scanned versions of printed works. A

CourseSmart e-book includes some neat functions, like search capability and digital note-taking, but for the most part, it has few advantages over a traditional textbook other than weight and price. (CourseSmart books usually cost less than half the price of a new printed book.)

That’s where a company like Inkling comes in. Inkling, a 20-person San Francisco startup, and its competitors—including New York

City’s ScrollMotion—are working with the textbook publishers to bring their books onto the iPad, iPhone, and other future devices. The aim, says Inkling’s MacInnis, is to harness all the advantages of a multitouch, Web-enabled slate. That means chemistry students won’t just see an illustration of a benzene molecule; they’ll spin and rotate a

three-dimensional model of one. Biology students won’t just read about the cardiovascular system; they’ll see video of a beating heart, narrated by a world-class heart surgeon.

Interactivity, though, is only part of the story. Bringing texts onto a digital platform provides an opportunity to make the book as social as the

classroom. With Inkling’s technology, for instance, a student can choose to follow another’s “note stream,” or view a heat map of the class’s

most-highlighted passages. Professors get real-time information on how much of the reading assignment the class actually did, or whether a particular review problem is tripping up large numbers of students. All that comes on top of the cost savings: even these advanced digital

textbooks will cost less than their print equivalents (with most of them in the $99 range) and some will even come “unbundled,” allowing students to buy the individual chapters they need most for a small fraction of the cost of a full textbook.

Textbook publishers stand to lose some revenue if individual chapter purchases catch on, but they hope to more than offset the loss by

attracting new customers. Big publishers like McGraw-Hill, Pearson, and Cengage are locked in a longstanding battle against the used-textbook market, which now totals about $2.2 billion, according to Simba, and from which they earn no revenue. Online textbook-rental companies like Chegg.com offer lower prices than the publishers, and reach a wide customer base. But traditional publishers think technology will be their salvation. There’s no such thing as a “used” e-book, and digital textbooks are the center of a whole ecosystem of services—such asipads,vs,textbook。

homework-management systems and video-capture technology for recording lectures—that publishers hope will be profitable. “We’re

becoming a software service company instead of a textbook company,” says Peter Davis, president of McGraw-Hill Education.

But what about the students? Are manipulable molecules just digital eye candy or real improvements to the learning process? “Technology is never the silver bullet, but it can sometimes be the bullet,” says Diana Rhoten, an education researcher and cofounder of Startl, which invests in innovative education companies. She notes that different students have different learning styles. Some are just fine reading text, whileipads,vs,textbook。

others prefer audiovisual aids, and kinesthetic learners need to interact with something. “In a digital book, I have all of those modalities available to me,” she says. “That is huge. Customization is going to have a great impact on learning.” And if it means getting an A in organic chemistry, paying $500 for an iPad seems like a smart choice.

第三篇:《Reading books online VS reading paper books》

Amber(Qing,Guo)

ELP112-02

Nov. 27, 2012

Reading Books Online vsReading Paper Books

I believe that everyone has read books online and read paper books, but, which way is the better way for us to read? I think different people have different answers. In order to find my answer, I have recently thought about the similarities and differences between reading books online and reading paper boo摘抄本ks.

The first aspect I want to talk about is the cost and convenience of reading books online and reading paper books. Usually, books online are less expensive than books which are printed on paper. However, reading books online uses plenty of batteries which cost a lot, while reading paper books don't use any batteries. Also, when readers want to take notes on what they read, books online are less convenient than paper books. Above all, as everyone knows, online books like the iPad and the Amazon

Kindle are easy for reader to take away than paper books, as these online books are lighter than traditional paper books.

Secondly, I would like to mention the aspect of body health and

environmental protection for both reading books online and reading paper books. On one hand, reading books online can make readers tired more easily than paper books. Also, books online are worse for readers' eyes than paper books. On the other hand, books online protect large numbers of trees than paper books, for paper books need trees to be made into paper.

The last point to consider is that the samecharacteristics that both reading books online and reading paper books have. They bothprovide the same stories, essays, and discussions which are written by the

samewriters. Whichever books readers choose to read, books online and paper books are both fabulous books for readers to learn more about the literature of the world.

As a consequence, online books are cheaper and more convenience than paper books, while paper books are easier to take notes and better for readers’ eyes than books online. Both online books and paper books are good for readers to get more knowledge about this enormous world. Everybody chooses his own way to read by seeing which way is more fitting for him. In my opinion, paper books won't disappear in the future, but books online will become more popular than paper books.

ipads,vs,textbook由小学生作文网收集整理,转载请注明出处!

---